The Safe State Tango


Voters who live in "safe" states -- those that will almost certainly be won by a particular candidate -- rarely think about whether their vote means what is almost universally presumed: that it will help the candidate they favor.

That is far from the truth. Think about it. A vote for the certain winner will only add unnecessarily to a large surplus of votes. It won't help that candidate at all.

Similarly, a vote for the certain loser in their state will only add unnecessarily to a large deficit of votes. Again, it doesn't really help that candidate catch up and win.

What to do with your vote in a safe state? Having read about VoteBuddy you know the answer already: use your vote to send a message. Even if you sincerely prefer one of the "top" candidates you should seriously consider whatever other option best matches your goals. For example, if you like Romney except for his refusal to make serious budget cuts, you might vote Libertarian or Constitution -- or write in Ron Paul because of the trillion dollars he would have immediately slashed from the budget. Or if you like Obama except for his abandonment of a peace agenda, you might vote Green (or write in Ron Paul) to support sincere efforts to make peace in the Mideast. Maybe you're just sick of the status quo in general. You might even choose to skip the presidential race when you vote, sending a message that would be entirely lost if you went with the crowd and voted for a "major" candidate.

Of course, for anyone who is still a bit nervous about abandoning the least awful Republican or Democrat candidate, there is the VoteBuddy option!

To summarize, being in a safe state is a gift. It gives you your vote back -- if you'll only take it. Instead of implying total approval of the R or the D, send a real message for change.



MENU

Home |  The Solution  |  FAQs  |  Third Parties  |  The Safe State Tango

The Swing State Samba |  Better Voting Methods  |  You Can Help!


Webmasters! Please link us to your site with this banner!


VoteBuddyTM, No!BuddyTM, and any associated logos are trademarks owned by Kent Van Cleave, who asks everyone not to set up a similar type of organization or service using any name that might be confused with "VoteBuddy."

If you would like to run your own VoteBuddy operation, franchises (under revokable licensing) will be liberally awarded to individuals or organizations who would like to encourage "Creative Vote Liberation" in their states and communities. After all, our mission is to break the two-party monopoly, and your help is very welcome! For information on VoteBuddy franchises, send email to Kent Van Cleave at (sorry -- no link provided as a spam-avoidance measure; you'll have to type the address yourself) info(at)votebuddy(dot)org. For other questions, visit our FAQ page.

VoteBuddy and Kent Van Cleave make no warranties concerning the results anyone might expect or desire from VoteBuddy participation -- especially concerning the performance of individuals who are paired as Vote Buddies. It is the responsibility of each participant to establish a basis for trust in the Vote Buddy s/he chooses. By voluntarily following the VoteBuddy strategy for freeing your vote, you agree to hold VoteBuddy and Kent Van Cleave harmless for any negative consequences that might be attributed to the VoteBuddy program or anyone connected with it. Hey, we'll do our best ... but we aren't gonna be lawsuit bait for anybody!

Finally, neither VoteBuddy nor Kent Van Cleave advocate the violation of any constitutional laws with this proposal. Anyone who contemplates pursuing this strategy should find out whether their state and local governments recognize their right to pursue any peaceful and honest means that will empower them to cast their votes according to their consciences. Where your freedom is prohibited by law, we can't advise you to resist your masters; that's a wholly personal choice.